I think that world at war needed atleast better graphics, the multiplayer was lousy, most of the guns were overpowerd. The guns with the most fire rate is the most op, like the *Type 100*.
Moving on, the single player was so-so, it had alost better graphics then multiplayer. The last thing i want to talk about is Nazi zombies, it seems that Treyarch did only focus on singleplayer and Nazi zombies because it runs smooth and has better graphics then the single player.

Feel free to post whatever thoughts you have on WaW, but i know most of you dont have it. >.>

What-the-fuck-am-I-reading.jpg? This game is like, 2 years old.

made by the B Team - same people that made APB - pile of failures

I still play it, and here are my thoughts.

Singleplayer - worse than MW or MW2 sure, but not bad. There were some cool moments like that sniper mission, the air cat (flying) mission and so on.

The graphics? They weren't that bad, I play the game and I have never ever complained about them, why? Cause they're not bad enough to make the game itself bad.

Multiplayer you say is bad? I say its good, its call of duty multiplayer. I go back to WaW sometimes to keep it fresh between, modern and old ya know. Its different, and different can be very fun.

Nazi zombies? Repetitive, but a HELL OF A LOT OF FUN... Get 3 other buddies and go kill some zombies.

Over all I think its a very good game, it was made by treyarch so it is significantly worse than the moderns but hell, I loved it, still enjoying it to this day. Played it online just yesterday.

i dont know what call of duty this was... but heres the best video of it by far
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XhufrnT48...r_embedded

(07-08-2010 12:24 PM)Dovi Wrote:  I still play it, and here are my thoughts.

Singleplayer - worse than MW or MW2 sure, but not bad. There were some cool moments like that sniper mission, the air cat (flying) mission and so on.

The graphics? They weren't that bad, I play the game and I have never ever complained about them, why? Cause they're not bad enough to make the game itself bad.

Multiplayer you say is bad? I say its good, its call of duty multiplayer. I go back to WaW sometimes to keep it fresh between, modern and old ya know. Its different, and different can be very fun.

Nazi zombies? Repetitive, but a HELL OF A LOT OF FUN... Get 3 other buddies and go kill some zombies.

Over all I think its a very good game, it was made by treyarch so it is significantly worse than the moderns but hell, I loved it, still enjoying it to this day. Played it online just yesterday.

im sorry dovi
what is your profile name in WaW?

I say nazi zombies is amazing... the single player is good for the first few run throughs... the rest is shit...

(07-13-2010 02:47 PM)Sgt.Pepper Wrote:  I say nazi zombies is amazing... the single player is good for the first few run throughs... the rest is shit...

same here, profile name?

Dovy KB

360.

I hated the multiplayer....... Nazi zombies just plain kicks ass no matter how much you play it and the single player was good..... but veteran is impossible due to the enemies constantly spamming grenades on it